La cirugía guiada como factor determinante para la colocación de implantes sin colgajo: Una revisión sistemática.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez, Monica C.spa
dc.contributor.authorBenítez Díaz, Alejandraspa
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cárdenas, Paula Andreaspa
dc.contributor.authorTorres Pineda, Ramiro Augustospa
dc.creator.cedula1094971918spa
dc.creator.cedula1094968721spa
dc.creator.cedula1097404818spa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T16:19:18Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11T16:19:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-27spa
dc.descriptionPropiaes_ES
dc.description.abstractAbstract Introduction: Currently, the availability of new medical imaging equipment facilitates the planning of the implant location using a technique with or without a flap, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), which allows the evaluation of the remaining bone structures and anatomical structures with greater precision and three-dimensional shape. Objective: Evaluate whether guided surgery is a determining factor for the placement of flapless implants compared to freehand surgical technique Methodology: Six electronic databases were used Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus,Google Scholar, Lilacs y Web of Science. For each database, a search strategy was used according to the criteria of the peak question, including mesh and non-mesh terms. Results: A total of 1715 studies were identified in the databases. Subsequently, the duplicates were eliminated, leaving a total of 1225 articles; of which 12 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the systematic review. The heterogeneity is made up of the type of implant system, different types of planning software, and different types of restorations. Conclusions: The literature suggests several methods to facilitate implant placement using both a guided and freehand flapless surgical approach. This systematic review does not reveal that there are studies available evaluating the precision of freehand flapless surgery for comparison with guided surgery; Guided surgery is not a determining factor for flapless implant placement compared to the freehand technique and more long-term comparative clinical studies evaluating flapless freehand surgery are required. It is recommended that the choice to use a guide or not for flapless surgery should be based on the skill of the operator and the individual characteristics of each patient.eng
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: En la actualidad la disponibilidad de nuevos equipos de imágenes médicas facilita la planificación de la ubicación del implante mediante una técnica con o sin colgajo, tales como la tomografía computarizada de haz cónico (CBCT) que permite evaluar las estructuras óseas remanentes y demás estructuras anatómicas con mayor precisión y de forma tridimensional. Objetivo: Evaluar si la cirugía guiada es un factor determinante para la colocación de implantes sin colgajo comparado a la técnica quirúrgica a mano alzada Metodología: Se utilizaron seis bases de datos electrónicas Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus,Google Scholar, Lilacs y Web of Science. para cada base de dato se tuvo una estrategia de búsqueda según los criterios de la pregunta pico, incluyendo términos mesh y no mesh. Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 1715 estudios en las bases de datos. Posteriormente se eliminaron los duplicados quedando un total de 1225 artículos; los cuales 12 artículos cumplieron los criterios de inclusión y fueron seleccionados para la revisión sistemática. La heterogeneidad se compone del tipo de sistema de implantes, diferentes tipos de software de planeación y diferentes tipos de restauración. Conclusiones: La literatura sugiere varios métodos para facilitar la ubicación de implantes mediante un abordaje quirúrgico sin colgajo tanto guiado como a mano alzada. Esta revisión sistemática no revela que haya estudios disponibles evaluando la precisión en la cirugía a mano alzada sin colgajo para realizar una comparación con la cirugía guiada; la cirugía guiada no es un factor determinante para la colocación de implantes sin colgajo comparada a la técnica a mano alzada y se requieren más estudios clínicos comparativos a largo plazo que evalúen la cirugía a mano alzada sin colgajo. Se recomienda que la elección de usar guía o no para una cirugía sin colgajo debe estar basada en la habilidad del operador y las características individuales de cada paciente.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameOdontólogo(a)spa
dc.description.notesPresencialspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation1. Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, D’Haese J. Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance. Vol. 22, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020. p. 454–67. 2. Cai H, Liang X, Sun DY, Chen JY. Long-term clinical performance of flapless implant surgery compared to the conventional approach with flap elevation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1087–103. 3. Van Assche N, Van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 18 Apr;37(4):398–403. 4. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of Implant Placement With Stereolithographic Surgical Guides Generated From Computed Tomography: Clinical Data From 94 Implants. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1339–45. 5. Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(SUPPL.6):124–35. 6. di Torresanto VM, Milinkovic I, Torsello F, Cordaro L. Computer-assisted flapless implant surgery in edentulous elderly patients: a 2-year follow up. Quintessence Int [Internet]. 2014 May;45(5):419–29. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24634906 7. Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, D’Haese J. Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance. Vol. 22, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2020. p. 454–67. 8. Voulgarakis A, Strub JR, Att W. Outcomes of implants placed with three different flapless surgical procedures: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(4):476–86. 9. Kareem JJ, Hikmet AS, Al Garrawi ), Badeia RA. A clinical assessment of periimplant marginal bone loss and soft tissue status in dental implant placed by flapless implant surgery. (A one-year prospective study). 2012. 10. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels during healing period, adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder implants inserted in the posterior zone of the jaws, placed with flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1386–93. 11. Nadine Brodala. Flapless Surgery and Its Effect on Dental Implant Outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:118–25. 12. Abdul M, Al Najjar H, Sahar ), Al-Adili S. Evaluation of Crestal Bone Resorption around Dental Implants in Flapped and Flapless Surgical Techniques Depending on Cone Beam CT Scan (Comparative Study). Vol. 31, J Bagh College Dentistry. 2019. 13. Bashutski JD, Wang H-L, Rudek I, Moreno I, Koticha T, Oh T-J. Effect of Flapless Surgery on Single-Tooth Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Periodontol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1747–54. 14. Nikzad S, Azari A. Custom-Made Radiographic Template, Computed Tomography, and Computer-Assisted Flapless Surgery for Treatment Planning in Partial Edentulous Patients: A Prospective 12-Month Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1353–9. 15. Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM, Sánchez-Pérez A, Cabaña-Muñoz ME. A Pilot Study of Postoperative Pain Felt After Two Implant Surgery Techniques: A Randomized Blinded Prospective Clinical Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(5):1305–10. 16. Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide TM)-guided implant positions: A prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1157–63. 17. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer Technology Applications in Surgical Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan;29(Supplement):25–42. 18. Moraschini V, Velloso G, Luz D, Porto Barboza E. Implant survival rates, marginal bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with flapless computer-guided surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 44, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Churchill Livingstone; 2015. p. 892–901. 19 19. Deeb JG, Bencharit S, Loschiavo CA, Yeung M, Laskin D, Deeb GR. Do Implant Surgical Guides Allow an Adequate Zone of Keratinized Tissue for Flapless Surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;76(12):2540–50. 20. Vercruyssen M, Van De Wiele G, Teughels W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: An RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Dec 1;41(12):1154–60.spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/3219
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Antonio Nariñospa
dc.publisher.campusArmeniaspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Odontologíaspa
dc.publisher.programOdontologíaspa
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subjectimplante dental, cirugía asistida por computadora, cirugía de implantes convencional, técnica a mano alzada, planeación virtual.es_ES
dc.subject.keywordimplant – dental, Computer-Assisted Surgeries, conventional implant surgery, freehand technique, virtual planninges_ES
dc.titleLa cirugía guiada como factor determinante para la colocación de implantes sin colgajo: Una revisión sistemática.es_ES
dc.typeTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
2020_AlejandraBenítezDíaz_Autorizacion.pdf
Size:
3.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
2020_AlejandraBenítezDíaz.pdf
Size:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Odontología