Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)Gonzalez, GretelArias Ubaque, Andrea IsabelAriza Garcia, JorgeGaleano Parra, Marvin CamiloForero Solano, Andrea Paola2023-01-162023-01-162022-11-17http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/7350Within the craniofacial complex, the influence of dental morphology in the ideal exercise of functions such as swallowing, phonation and chewing is highlighted, mainly the role of the first molars as determining pillars, coming to be considered the key to occlusion, through establishing the type of malocclusion present (class I, II, III). This classification is directly related to the morphological variations of both the upper and lower molars.Dentro del complejo craneofacial, se destaca la influencia de la morfología dental en el ejercicio ideal de funciones como deglución, fonación y masticación, principalmente el papel de los primeros molares como pilares determinantes, llegando a ser considerados la llave de la oclusión, a través de establecer el tipo de maloclusión presente (clase I, II, III). Esta clasificación está directamente relacionada con las variaciones morfológicas tanto del molar superior como del molar inferiorspaAcceso a solo metadatossubmorfotipopatrón cuspídeo,morfología oclusal,molar superior - molar inferior.617.643Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)submorphotypecusp pattern,occlusal morphologyupper molar - lower molar.info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbAngle, E. H. (1899). Classification of Malocclusion. The Dental Cosmos, 41(3), 248–264.Bailey, S. E. (2000). Dental morphological affinities among late Pleistocene and recent humans. In Dental Anthropology Journal (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 5–14). https://doi.org/10.26575/daj.v13i3.194Bailey, S. E. (2002). Neandertal Dental Morphology: Implications for Modern Human Origins. The Anatomical Record (New Anat.), 269(December), 256.Bailey, S. E. (2006). The Evolution of non-metric dental variation in Europe. Mitteilungen Der Gesellschaft Für Urgeschichte, 15(March), 9–29.Butler, P. M. (1956). the Ontogeny of Molar Pattern. Biological Reviews, 31(1), 30–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1956.tb01551.xChristensen, G., & Kraus, B. (1965). Initial calcification of the human permanent first molar. 44, 1338–1342.Dempsey, P. J., & Townsend, G. C. (2001). Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity, 86(6), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00878.xFelemban, N. H., & Manjunatha, B. S. (2017). Prevalence of the number of cusps and occlusal groove patterns of the mandibular molars in a Saudi Arabian population. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 49, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.05.013Harris, E. F., & Dinh, D. P. (2006). Intercusp relationships of the permanent maxillary first and second molars in American whites. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 130(4), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20389Hernández Sampieri, R. (2005). Metodologia de la investigacion (sexta).instname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoreponame:Repositorio Institucional UANrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/