Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)Cruz Uribe, Jaime FabianAngel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola2021-03-052021-03-052020-07-10http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms.El objetivo principal fue evaluar las ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas tipo “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia, para así poder hacer una comparación entre los diferentes tipos de producción porcina que existe, basándonos en tres parámetros principales, estereotipias, mortalidad de lechones y enfermedades parasitarias, de igual manera lograr analizar estos tipos de sistemas en relación con el bienestar animal, basándonos en los principios de las 5 libertades.spaAcceso a solo metadatosBienestar animalsistemas de producción porcinasistemas intensivos de producción de cerdossistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdosbienestar en cerdas gestantesbienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactanciaprotocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdossistemas tipo outdoormortalidad de lechonesparasitismo en producciones porcinasestereotipias en cerdosenriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdosTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)Animal welfarepig production systemsintensive pig production systemsorganic pig production systemswelfare in pregnant sowswelfare in lactating sowsprotocols for organic systems in pigsoutdoor type systemspiglet mortalityparasitism in pig productionsstereotypies in pigsenvironmental enrichment in pigsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbAntunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2Budiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301Bunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netCaldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005Campiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirectCharlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirectChoi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218Código Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestreCriterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/Edwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13Fernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004Gade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7Godyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383Gourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect.Grunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022Horback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002Hötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010Huerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arIzquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.arKijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9KilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004Knecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005Kobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015Lange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815xLindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3Lühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012Luković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netMaganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896Manteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arMellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060Mesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018Nazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095Oliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.brOliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253Park, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochureRuff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010Schrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308Scipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117Špinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netTatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079Tavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001instname:Universidad Antonio Nariñoreponame:Repositorio Institucional UANrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/