Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorCruz Uribe, Jaime Fabianspa
dc.contributor.authorAngel Gonzalez, Jenny Paolaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T15:50:59Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T15:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-10spa
dc.description.abstractThe main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms.eng
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo principal fue evaluar las ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas tipo “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia, para así poder hacer una comparación entre los diferentes tipos de producción porcina que existe, basándonos en tres parámetros principales, estereotipias, mortalidad de lechones y enfermedades parasitarias, de igual manera lograr analizar estos tipos de sistemas en relación con el bienestar animal, basándonos en los principios de las 5 libertades.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameMédico(a) Veterinario(a)spa
dc.description.notesPresencialspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAntunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBaxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBudiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCaldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCampiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirectspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCharlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirectspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationChoi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCódigo Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestrespa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCriterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEdwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGodyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect.spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGrunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHorback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHuerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIzquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.arspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKnecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815xspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLuković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMaganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationManteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.arspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.brspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPark, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochurespa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRuff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSchrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationScipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationŠpinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.netspa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091spa
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationVan de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001spa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Antonio Nariñospa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UANspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Antonio Nariñospa
dc.publisher.campusBogotá - Circunvalarspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicina Veterinariaspa
dc.publisher.programMedicina Veterinariaspa
dc.rightsAcceso a solo metadatos
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbspa
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.subjectBienestar animales_ES
dc.subjectsistemas de producción porcinaes_ES
dc.subjectsistemas intensivos de producción de cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectsistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectbienestar en cerdas gestanteses_ES
dc.subjectbienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactanciaes_ES
dc.subjectprotocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectsistemas tipo outdoores_ES
dc.subjectmortalidad de lechoneses_ES
dc.subjectparasitismo en producciones porcinases_ES
dc.subjectestereotipias en cerdoses_ES
dc.subjectenriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdoses_ES
dc.subject.keywordAnimal welfarees_ES
dc.subject.keywordpig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordintensive pig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordorganic pig production systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordwelfare in pregnant sowses_ES
dc.subject.keywordwelfare in lactating sowses_ES
dc.subject.keywordprotocols for organic systems in pigses_ES
dc.subject.keywordoutdoor type systemses_ES
dc.subject.keywordpiglet mortalityes_ES
dc.subject.keywordparasitism in pig productionses_ES
dc.subject.keywordstereotypies in pigses_ES
dc.subject.keywordenvironmental enrichment in pigses_ES
dc.titleRevisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.es_ES
dc.typeTrabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
2020JennyPaolaAngelGonzalez.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Trabajo de grado
Download
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
2020AutorizaciondeAutores.pdf
Size:
431.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Autorización de autores
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
thumbnail.default.alt
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Medicina veterinaria